Tag Archives: Half Acre Row

1899 Threatening a Man

MITCHAM.

Threatening a Man

— At Croydon County Bench on Monday, Jane Holder, of Resurrection-place, Half Acre-row, Mitcham, was summoned for using threatening language towards Charles Marshall on 6th May.

– Complainant said that on the date stated the defendant was the worse for drink, and called him a counterfeit and threatened to rip him up.—This was corroborated.

– Defendant having called rebutting evidence, was bound over to keep the peace.

Source: Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 27 May 1899 from the British Newspaper Archive (subscription required)

1890 Half Acre Row Summonses for Dilapidated Houses

Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 25 October 1890

HALF ACRE ROW

The Clerk said the summonses against Mr. Reekie in respect to dilapidated tenements in Half Acrerow had been heard, and orders were made prohibiting the use the premises for human habitation, and ordering them to closed forthwith. The summonses against Mr. Nightingale were withdrawn, having disposed of the premises to Mr. George Pitt. Mr. Pitt had given a written undertaking to carry out the work required be done the satisfaction the Authority.

1877 Young Thieves

Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 22 December 1877

Young Thieves.

— Before Mr. T. R. Edridge, on Wednesday, at the Croydon Police Court, five boys named John Bearns, of Smith’s Buildings, Mitcham, Joseph Russell, Half-acre-row, Albert Bowling, Smith’s buildings, William Rosier, of Common Side, and Matthew Rosier, of the same address, were brought up in custody, charged with stealing from inside the shop No. 13, High-street, Mitcham, five tins of condensed milk and one pot of marmalade, the property of Mr. James Clarke.

— By their own admission the boys went into the shop of Mr. Clarke on Wednesday evening and bought sweets, and on leaving, took the opportunity each helping himself to the condensed milk.

— Bearns, Russell, and Bowling were sent to Horsemonger-lane gaol till Monday, and the other two were ordered to be taken to the workhouse till to-day.

1890 Stealing Radishes

Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 09 August 1890
page 6

Stealing Radishes.—

At the Croydon County Bench on Thursday, before Sir Thomas Edridge and Mr. J. Cooper, Mary Ann Penfold and Eliza Harris, flower sellers, Half Acre-row, Mitcham, were charged with stealing radishes, the property of Wm. Muzen, at Mitcham.

– P.-c. Vine (47 W) said that six o’’clock on Wednesday evening he saw the prisoners pulling radishes in a field near St. John’’s-place, Church-road. As they admitted having no permission to do so he took them into custody. The radishes were produced, and were contained in a large basket and two large bundles.—

– Mrs. Penfold appeared and made a rambling statement about the radishes, saying that there were numbers of others picking radishes, but Vine only took the two prisoners. —Mrs. Harris also bore out this statement, and said the field was full children gathering radishes. —

– The prisoners were fined 2s. 6d., 2s. 6d. costs, and 3s., the value the radishes.

Notes

Should that be Mizen, not Muzen?

1879 Removing a fence

Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 20 September 1879

Removing a Fence at Mitcham.
—A Question of Right.

— At the Croydon Petty Sessions on Saturday, Henry, James, and John Kemp, and George Hills were summoned for unlawfully and maliciously throwing down a fence erected round piece of land belonging to John Mead, of Mitcham.
— Mr. Ilderton appeared for the defendants, and Mr. Parry for the complainant.

— Mr. Ilderton said he thought he could save the time of the Bench. The fence had been removed by instructions from John Kemp, who had been in possession of the land in question, situate at Half-acre-row, for about 40 years. As the land was claimed by his client, the jurisdiction of the Bench was ousted.

— Mr. Parry replied that the land was held by his client under a good title, and there was no colour to the claim of the defendant John Kemp.

— Mr. Ilderton remarked that the course taken his clients had been pursued under the advice of counsel.

— Mr. Parry said Mead held the land under building agreement from Mr. Beetham. A bare assertion of claim was insufficient; it must be a colourable title. That defendants had had possession of the land for twelve years and over had no bearing on the case; there must be some colour of a title. It had been decided that, if the party used unnecessary violence in asserting their right, the question of title should be entirely outside the magistrates’ decision, and unless defendants could show some proof of title, the magistrates’ jurisdiction was not gone. Mr. Beetham was the freeholder, and had granted lease of land on which 14 houses wore about to be erected by Mr. Mead.

— Mr. Ilderton said he should show that John Kemp had been in possession of the land for years, and the argument about unnecessary violence was absurd

— Mr. Parry, continuing, said the fence in question was erected under the agreement at a cost of £10. The defendants met on the 6th, and pulled it down in an unlawful way, giving the fence away to other people. If they had wanted to assert a right they might have pulled down part of the fence or taken legal proceedings.

— John Mead, Fieldgate, Mitcham, grocer and provision merchant, was then called, and said he had taken a piece of ground at Half-acre-row, under an agreement from Mr. Beetham, and had promised to build 11 cottages thereon. He erected a fence round the land, the materials and labour costing him close upon £10. He had the fence up four months, and the ground was cropped, but had had no claim made to it anyone until now. On the 6th September he saw the fence at four o’clock in the afternoon, and went away, and on his return the fence had disappeared.

— Cross-examined.—The date of the agreement was 20th May, 1879. He gave notice to a man named Simons on 18th February that if had any herbs on the land he should remove them, he (Mead) was going to use the land. He had possession at that date, but the agreement was not made.—Abraham Akerman, Half-acre-row, Mitcham, stated that on the 6th September last he saw three of defendants on the land in question. Henry Kemp had a crowbar knocking the fence down, James Kemp had a hammer, and Hills had a horse buckling it round the posts and pulling them up. James Kemp was standing in the middle of the ground looking on. The fence was taken away by various people.

— Cross-examined.— He did not hear any of the defendants tell the people to take the fence away.—Thomas George Day, residing with Mr. Mead, was also called, as was P.-c. (376) W, the latter of whom said he saw a mob of people at Half-acre-row and saw James Kemp and George Hills engaged in pulling the posts up. He asked who had authorised them to pull the fence, and they referred him to John Kemp, who said he had authorised them to remove the fence, and told him not to interfere. This being the complainant’s case. Mr. Ilderton said he could show that the property had been in the possession of John Kemp for over years at any rate. He called Jeremiah Simons, aged 89, who said he bad occupied land under Mr. John Kemp for 15 years at Half-acrerow — part of the land in question—and Mr. Kemp had been in possession it for years. He had never been disturbed, although a threat had been held out which had not been carried out.—By Mr. Parry—He could not sell the crop on this piece of land. Mr. Mead had dug it in. He paid Kemp 2s. year for the land. He had it for a mere song for old acquaintance sake. The land was worth more money than he paid for it. He did not remember William Hornidge bringing an action of ejectment; but he did remember Mr. Nightingale building houses on the land, but this was done illegally.

— Charles Tanner, shoemaker of Mitcham, said he knew the ground fenced off by Mr. Mead, and he knew the land had been in John Kemp’s possesion for 30 years. He had never known any dispute to his title.

– Cross-examined.—He could swear that 12 years ago he sow John Kemp cultivating the land in question. His brother occupied a piece of ground on the land, but Mr. Kemp did not charge him any rent for it.—Mr. Edridge— What a kind person Mr. Kemp is.—He did not know that Kemp was ejected by Mr. Hornidge from this land in 1859.

— The Bench in the end dismissed the summonses, the case being out of their jurisdiction. Mr. Ilderton applied for costs, which were refused, Mr. Edridge reminding the defendants that there was more than one way of asserting a right.

1910 Straying Animals

Croydon Advertiser and East Surrey Reporter – Saturday 13 August 1910

STRAYING ANIMALS

-At the Croydon County Bench on Saturday, before the Chairman (Ald. R. V. Barrow), Mr. T. E. Stephens. Mr. E. Densham, Capt. A. H. N. Kemmis, Mr. E. Byron, and Mr. E. W. Grimwade, appeared James Crutch, 1, Half Acre-row, Mitcham. He had allowed his horse to stray on the highway. He said he was out of work and had no food for it, so turned it out. Being the first time the Bench said “Excused”.

—The ass and horse of Alfred Deacon, 7, Seaton-road, Mitcham, also went astray, and he had “nothing to say”. The police said the members of defendant’s family took ownership in turns so as to save the summonses. Fined 2s. 6d. and costs.

—Frank Jelly, 16a, Seaton-road, Mitcham, for allowing two horses and a donkey stray at Mitcham, was fined 7s. 6d. and costs.